furry.ca forum
furry.ca forum
home to furry.ca search furry.ca forum members of furry.ca forum help topics

May 24, 2012, 12:14:00 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The forum's rules are posted in the announcements board! Be sure to read them! Smiley
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Who Am I?  (Read 2953 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« on: May 01, 2008, 12:05:43 PM »

Hmm. An interesting statement, no? Rather difficult to find an accurate place to put something like this on the website, I mean, it's not exactly appropriate for an initial 'hello' post, nor is it something that can easily be slotted in anywhere. Yes, it's a 'user profile' item, but something of this volume and complexity doesn't really translate well to a generic profile box, nor is there any such box that can specifically be attached to a single user of this forum. Besides, I'm pretty sure I'd exceed whatever word or character limit that would be implemented on such a box.

So basically, here it is, in the most applicable portion of the site I can find (basically, the area for unbridled written creativity, or the notepad).

By and large, I am me. This is true for everyone, but what defines 'me'? How do I myself bound the structure and mentality that is 'me'? It's not so easy as it sounds.

Back when I first joined the fandom, I came up with Aaeden. Yes, the extra 'a' is vital, and it is pronounced A-DEN, not AH-DEN, or AY-DEN, or any other way. It's sort of an odd name, but it fits, and I've grown quite happy and accustomed to it. From my first days in Furcadia up until the modern me, this is the name that closely reflects me as a person in real life and in furry.

Shortly afterwards, when I was exploring the ability to play a role in the opposite gender, namely, the feminine, I realized that, to me, Aaeden was a very male-sounding name, and I needed something feminine to match that role. So I came up with D`Nae. Pronounced DEN-A. See it? Yeah, it took me a couple years to see it, believe it or not. I had created a new name for myself that was basically my original name backwards.

In case you're wondering, the creativity is on its way. I'll be tossing out my character descriptions and other bits and bobs that I've built up around my characters.

Regardless, here we are. I'd started exploring Aaeden and figuring out exactly what to do with him. I knew he was feline. There's a big draw to the feline in my personality and I figured it would be good to set him up with what I felt was best. He started out as a snow leopard, because honestly, I have no issue with cold weather in any fashion, being Canadian. This lasted for a little while, but was never firmly ironed out, and despite the fact that it fit one specific personality feature, I still switched species for some unknown reason. I started, and still do, identifying as an ocelot.

Quote
Aaeden's past isn't mystical or shadowy, his demeanor both distinctly reserved in his interactions, and at the same time, conversely expressive. He came from a simple family with simple goals and simple means, and has become a unique creature in and of himself. Often clothed in loose, if not outright baggy, clothing, he is often found crouched over some form of desk or worktable, either reading thickly bound books or tinkering with a wide variety of devices or inventions. Between the thick leather strap of his green goggles and the laced top of his favorite cream shirt, the ocelot's face is often smiling and happy, green eyes twinkling when talking to his closest friends, sometimes contorted into an intent focus on his current item of interest, or even more differently, slack and distant as he contemplates the more meaningful and indirect questions that he often gets stuck on. His favorite pants are the ones he keeps most of his tools in, adjustable spanner, screwdriver, and a variety of other oddments, mostly in the capacious pockets of the tough and resistant fabric. His tail coils flexibly from the rump of his pants, a sewn hole carefully constructed in the material showing not just his interest in things of a more mechanical nature, but his attention to detail in the manufacture and maintenance of material goods as well. The ocelot often dabbles in anything that he can show an advantage in due to his analytical and focused nature, including cooking and design.

Now, in order to understand Aaeden, I need to make a few assumptions here. Assuming you are willing to look at some stereotypical profiling for a moment (hopefully there's less of you that are willing and more that aren't, but it's a good basis to refer to), Aaeden is your stereotypical female, even though he's male. He doesn't fit all stereotypes, but he's the guy you'll ask for interior design tips, would expect to get emotional at a movie theater during a sappy romance, etc. He's more geared towards males than females in sexual encounters, but overall, is not a sexual creature. Sure, this is very much based in stereotyping, so I'll be more explicit.

  • Aaeden is more responsive emotionally to other people and circumstances. (Emotional)
  • Aaeden is more analytical and methodical.
  • Aaeden is more likely to want to have long drawn out conversations about odd topics.
  • Aaeden loves to cook.
  • Aaeden gets embarrassed easily.
  • Aaeden is mostly passive, and only occasionally assertive.

Given that, you should probably get the idea. Smiley

Moving on, D`Nae, the converse of Aaeden, is very much a sexual creature. She's also more assertive and has a propensity of being violent. She is an arctic hare, and always has been, but her form is mutable. Unlike Aaeden, who has a very strictly defined persona and description, D`Nae has the advantage of being moderately polymorphic. While most forms she takes are not directly assigned to her persona, an alternate form has recently made its way into use on a regular basis.

D`Nae's Arctic Hare Form:
Quote
Your gaze can't help but fall on the giant hare, her snow white fur contrasting almost everything in the immediate vicinity, and her sheer size overbearing everything else. Not often can she be seen somewhere where she fits in, only the first reason of which being her size and coloration. She stands at about 10' tall, as far as you can tell, the fact that there isn't much to compare her to only self-evident. Her form is soft and ill-defined, the soft fuzz of her fur gracing the ample curves of her body. Her face is unremarkable for a hare, but one of her soft pink ears is graced with what appears to be a cattle-tag, black in color and branded with a shining silver skull. Her chest is constrained in a rather snug, but not uncomfortable-looking leather corset, criss-crossed with thick black thread across the center, where a hint of her white fluff spills out at the top, enough to give a good view of her compressed cleavage. Her legs are clad in a comparatively loose-fitting pair of black pants, adorned with a variety of chains and buckles, decidedly haphazard in arrangement and design as they sweep straight down to her ankles, where her gigantic footpads jut out from under the garment, flat against the floor. Her thick arms are bare from the neck down to her elbows, not even interrupted by a strap from her corset as her form is more than sufficient to fill it snugly. Her forearms are adorned with a pair of lace operatic gloves, just loose enough to slide on and off with little effort. Her thick paws again provide a harsh contrast between the black and white, muted slightly by the soft pink on her paws.

D`Nae's Lizardine Form:
Quote
You can't be sure exactly what you're seeing, but it definitely is impressive. Before you is a towering creature of mixed heritage, hir scaly hide glistening in whatever light is available. Shi towers at least half as tall again as an average humanoid creature, measuring in at approximately 8' tall. The head of this creature is very lizard-like, a rounded skull considerably smaller than hir stature would indicate, tapering down to a large muzzle with thick green lips stretching widely in a grin along its edges. Hir eyes bulge gently out of the sides of hir skull, pitch black with hints of green, and hir ears stretch up and along the top of hir skull just behind them. Hir ears, instead of being made up of flesh to channel a sound into the internal cavity of hir skull, are fans of webbing. Thin, almost transparent flesh is stretched between scaled tubes surrounding very sensitive nerve-endings that transmit sound and vibrations down into hir skull. They fan up and back, nestled right next to a thin pair of black horns that guide and channel hir soft silver hair down hir back. Hir shoulders angle downwards ever so slightly, broad and strong, covered in a number of iridescent scales, forming an almost elegant epaulette of color before plunging into hir vast cleavage, the bulging breasts tight and firm, although supple, the center of hir chest billowing a gold hue from below hir wide jaw to down hir belly and between hir thighs. Hir chest is bound tightly by a simple leather band, solid and thick and cinched behind hir back, the brown material dull against hir skin.

Hir arms are long and firm, muscular, but also lightly padded. They end in elegant black claws, thick and curved on each of hir four digits, a hint of gold touching the underside of hir wrist. Hir belly sparkles with iridescence as well, the surface smooth yet not muscled, bulging ever so slightly in a healthy swell. Almost entirely golden, a small divet can be seen in the lower center of hir belly, indicating something similar to a bellybutton, but much more well-formed and circular than what might be considered natural. Hir thighs spread from hir belly, gaining more of the green that slides across hir frame, until the gold terminates completely further down hir legs. Hir taloned claws hold hir upright, the fourth claw facing back to give hir a stilted balance, the toeclaws much more developed than those on hir hands, causing hir to perch with hir legs ever so slightly bent. Hir tail is long and thick, more of the iridescence dotting the top as it curves round, terminating in a spaded tip, almost leaf-shaped and completely green, as most of the tail is far from the periphery of the gold splotches across hir front.

Hir hips are adorned by a leather skirt made up of interconnected and overlapped leather bands similar to the one across hir chest, however dangling from hir waist such that they slide back and forth around hir muscular lower limbs, hiding enough but not much more than that. Besides these, the glistening creature is completely unclothed and unadorned with any form of decoration, hir natural irridescence more than enough to be showy without overdoing it.

As of yet, D`Nae's lizardine form has no associated species (namely, because it's something I made up). As far as D`Nae's personality goes, the way she differs from Aaeden is typically as follows:

  • Being imposing or intimidating is not an option, it's a rule.
  • D`Nae is largely dominant in nature, but the largely sexual aspect of her persona allows her flexibility in this regard. She can play submissive as well as fill roles that do not directly relate to her overall persona.
  • D`Nae is less worried about art and writing than she is in social interaction, gossip, and hedonism.
  • D`Nae is more superficial when engaging with others, but also has a higher energy output than Aaeden does.
  • Violent sports and Nascar racing are preferred over golf and theater.

So basically, that's it. I think I've written everything I wanted to get out there on this.

Comments? Opinions? Think I should be more specific about something? Comments / criticisms / opinions are welcome!
Logged

Lady Serpent
Staff
downright shaggy

Dhole-Raptor hybrid

*
Offline Offline

Oliver, BC
Posts: 1437


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2008, 03:58:05 PM »

That's a very interesting description.  Definately gives some insight into your characters, and with that, a bit into your own personality as well.

It's neat that you portray one aspect of yourself as the large, domineering lizard.  It's quite the split, though I do quite understand how that goes.

It's neat to read into such a well-written description.  Your characters are defined exquisitely and even the physical descriptions are done with such expressive language that you really paint a clear picture of what they look like.  After reading the description of the lizard femme, her image stands out solidly in my mind.

So, it's pronounced 'Eh-den'?  (Or is it more like 'Eh-Din'?  ((subtle difference))).  The third pronounciation confuses one, as it seems like 'AY-den' as written would be the same as 'Eh-din', and also that 'A-din' as written, would sound to me more like 'Ahh-den'.  So, now that we're all thoroughly confused with my speal, which way do you pronounce it again?

Very interesting characters.

I'd actually discuss it further, but I'm watching a very upset dog at the moment and I feel he needs some attention.  Poor git.

-Lady Serpent
Logged

Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2008, 04:31:35 PM »

My description is only a small insight into my writing style. More often than not the issue I have when writing is that I get so stuck with overly describing things that sometimes plot doesn't go anywhere. I'm working to balance that as I progress in my writing to improve and generate some form of style, but I'm glad that the description does give you insight into the nature and character of them as well. I take it as a huge compliment! Cheesy

As far as pronunciation goes, it's pronounced A (like the letter, alone, ie ABC) and then DEN (like a fox's den). And you're right, I think I was dredging the bottom of the bucket for incorrect pronunciations when I tossed out AY-DEN, so it's not really relevant. Smiley

As far as the split goes, I also find it unique that my ocelot is the closest thing to a solid 'predator', and is the least imposing, whereas the rabbit / lizard duality is more of a predatory creature, even though animalistically, they aren't so much. Less so the lizard than the rabbit, of course.

I also find that the description of my ocelot is always less distinct than that of my other creatures, especially in this case when I was drafting it up using no preexisting text, and the descriptions of my other characters are taken from one of the MUCKs I frequent. I remember distinctly the day I described D`Nae the lizard... I was on such a creative kick that I could taste it, so I'm glad it stuck. Cheesy

I'd love to discuss more, and look forward to getting to know you! Cheesy
Logged

Mobile Suit Bunny
rather fluffy

Oryctolagus Inebrius

***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
HMCS Montreal, 7 mess, rack 12
Posts: 155


« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2008, 10:03:19 PM »

Hooray, someone opposite me.

I eschew description for dialogue. I could write dialogue for days, witty banter back an forth, but when it comes to 'what does this room look like,' well...

'Mm. It's a room. S'got four walls. Wallpaper's pretty tacky. -taptap- Walls are hollow as hell, too. I would wager, in fact, madam, that we are in the Bates Motel of a Friday afternoon and Norman's just getting excited. ... Well, excuse -me- for getting too metaphorical. I thought nobody was scared of that bloody shower scene these days. You can just take a bath if it pleases you. And when you towel off you may find your amateur Holmes has inconveniently wandered down to the bar and is halfway to bliss, and then where will you be?'
Logged

'Wotcha doin?'
'Never you mind.'

<3 336, the poor confused frigate: Can't take a Sea King, and still waiting for a Cyclone.

[Public] Ronas Alabar: cc is actually latin for 'bad rolls'
Harle
rather fluffy

Aww s'a l'il mousie! ^.^

***
Offline Offline

New Brunswick
Posts: 116


« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2008, 06:51:47 AM »

Nicely written stuff!

You put a lot of thought into your characters, that's really fun. And to add to what LS said, it really does kind of give a window into the personality of the writer. I've found that there's no better way to understand someone than to see how they would like to appear, or perhaps more accurately, how they would identify themselves if they could be anything. And what interests them enough to model entire characters around with which to play.

I'm pretty bad about being overly descriptive too, though I've toned down more and more over the years. Now I'm just verbose. Subtle difference. ;P

Chuck Palahniuk taught me the power of 'less is more.' And the power of describing things with feeling and metaphor rather than detail. He writes powerfully, it flows like white water rapids. (Chuck wrote Fight Club and other stuff, if you're interested!)

I have a feeling Mobile'd like his stuff, from the sounds of it. =P

Logged
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2008, 09:08:42 AM »

Beautiful! Thanks for the compliments and comments, both.

MSB: Stylistically, there's nothing wrong with dialogue. Smiley It's a wonderful thing and, done properly, does it's job perfectly. Your brief description is very explicit in its own way, and I find it lends itself well to humor and emotion, as I couldn't help but giggle at the content. The best thing about being creative is no two people are the same, and I'm loving your style!

Harle: Thanks much, and yes, it does give a window into personality. I just need to focus a little more on altering the personality based on the subject (which I've been doing lately anyways). Damn right there's a difference between verbose and overly descriptive. Wink I totally agree with the less is more, but I seem to have this incredible drive to stuff as much description I can into something until JUST before it looks to be too much. I'm not sure if that's verbosity, or just plain stubbornness. I should take a look into this Chuck Palahniuk, as it sounds interesting. Smiley Thanks for the suggestion!
Logged

Mobile Suit Bunny
rather fluffy

Oryctolagus Inebrius

***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
HMCS Montreal, 7 mess, rack 12
Posts: 155


« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2008, 12:03:58 AM »

Chuck Palahniuk taught me the power of 'less is more.' And the power of describing things with feeling and metaphor rather than detail. He writes powerfully, it flows like white water rapids. (Chuck wrote Fight Club and other stuff, if you're interested!)

I have a feeling Mobile'd like his stuff, from the sounds of it. =P

Possibly. Since I've been paying more attention to movies I've noticed Kevin Smith's and Guy Ritchie's dialogue a lot. I think KS tries too hard; almost like the Alanis of movie dialogue. And Ritchie's characters all start sounding the same after a while, which is a pity because I think he has a great ear for an off-the-wall turn of phrase.

I'm holding out hope for Rock'n'Rolla, though. How can it be bad? The Russian mob through Ritchie eyes. =D
Logged

'Wotcha doin?'
'Never you mind.'

<3 336, the poor confused frigate: Can't take a Sea King, and still waiting for a Cyclone.

[Public] Ronas Alabar: cc is actually latin for 'bad rolls'
Seamus
fluffy beast

Navy Fur

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Washington St. USA
Posts: 273


« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2008, 04:55:49 PM »

Kevin smith can be a bit wordy, and meaning can get lost pretty easily if you don't have a good attention span.  But Clerks is still my favorite movie to this day without a doubt.

Very awesome description you've posted Aaeden.  Its not very often you meet someone who's able to communicate so vividly yet keep it "to-the-point".  I would enjoy reading anything you've written i'm sure, furry or not furry.  Preferably if you have any articles or essays in print or just to yourself Cheesy

Clear communicators, those who are good with money, and someone you can trust with your life:  3 kinds of people who are few and far between.
Logged

I embrace my desire to feel the rhythm, to feel connected enough to step aside and weep like a widow to feel inspired, to fathom the power,to witness the beauty, to bathe in the fountain, to swing on the spiral of our divinity and still be a human.
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2008, 08:57:25 AM »

Seamus: I'll have to make a point of posting something up here. I have no problem writing, it's just getting myself in the spiritual and mental position to write that tends to get a bit dicey. I don't often have the time or inclination without putting in a lot of focus to write anything beyond a once-over or roleplay on a muck or something.

The downside is I don't have anything in print at the moment. I'm working on some book ideas, but nothing I've gotten past the 'plot and character' point with to actually write something. Heck, maybe using this forum will act as an excuse to actually write something and put up bits and pieces of it here for review. Smiley

I totally agree that clear communicators are few and far between. Here's hoping the ones there are can influence more people to become clear communicators when they see how effective communication can be. Smiley
Logged

Snapdragonfly
new furball?

Unknown

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Alberta
Posts: 36


WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2008, 11:25:48 PM »

Sublime! I really enjoyed reading this, as well as your little story idea/teaser. All of your characters are very intriguing and belivable. Something I discovered back when I moderated, a lot of people are obsessed with making perfect characters that dazzle and steal the scene or are so utterly mysterious and obviously trying to be that kind of cool.. It's good to see some 3D characterization!
Logged
Snapdragonfly
new furball?

Unknown

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Alberta
Posts: 36


WWW
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2008, 11:35:12 PM »

I suddenly recalled a little monologue I wrote of which this topic had reminded me, and lo and behold it's actually still in my files here on my compy. I don't know exactly when it was written, but the file says it was modified in 2006. I can tell exactly what my frame of mind was then. Hopefully some of you will also get a kick out of it.

A Monologue

Here I sit, to write upon a moment’s paltry reflection…
A girl, stands on an empty stage, and in front of her are empty seats…

And there she is sublime.
Her expressions exquisite, her words enthralling..
If only the theatre were occupied!

(she laughs) Alas my dear friends. This little girl, of a not quite so tender or innocent age
and of vast imagination.. Her problem is not the empty seats.

And not the fact that her only audience is, yes! Her reflection..
One might think that the problem lies inside her mind,
For.. her stage is of a much smaller nature, than the theatre I had you so grandly imagine.

I am alone. But thrill in it, for then I am truly myself.
Wicked?
Dear sweet compatriot, say it is not so.
I my dear, have always made a very good friend of myself.

For when one often is alone, you cultivate a delectable mind.
Alone I enjoy the sweetness of fables I myself conjure from the deep,
I am privy to the visitation of dark dangers, exciting fear and a passion for life in all its glory.

I am divine, and I express. Unafraid, of the unknown fear that stills my tongue,
When in such fine company as yours. Or when any other graces mine presence. 
A lucky, and confused few, have glimpsed my endearing oddities.

Yet none have truly had a taste of the delicious plots within my mind.
Some think, to look upon me that I am wanting in the pleasures of the flesh!
And yes, catch me in the right frame, and I will devilishly agree, and perhaps parley for a while with them in the dear game of the pitiable and most lonesome creatures.   

But then again, I do spend a small portion of my time disdaining such frivolous activity.
A very good deal of the rest of my time I spend in the utter sheep hood of the droll day-to-day mechanics of composing my regular life. 
And every now and again, I am alone, and I awake to find myself wholly
strange and graceful.
Then I imagine what it would be like to have the power to pretend to be
on the grand stage
who I really am inside!

Would they be stunned? Or merely take it to be another fragmented piece
of an unsound mind?

Who are we really? I ask only because,
I am so much more
than (m)any will know..
Think how much more interesting the play would be!
Until, the time is right, until we overcome this pettiness that holds back the tide.
Triumph! At last.
Beware, for we will not explain ourselves then,
And I shall not bow to the wishes and desires of any unperceiving people around me.

Until then, I cannot wait for the chance to meet you.
Logged
Seamus
fluffy beast

Navy Fur

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Washington St. USA
Posts: 273


« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2008, 03:34:31 AM »

Snapdragon, a word of advice here.  Your writing style is very choppy, and it seems you overcomplicate it with the use of your words.  The ideas underneath it are great, and the ideas flow well together, the writing however does not.  Try to use complex words where they are needed, and simple words more often.  It will make your writing have a much better impact.  Don't take offense to this because it's simply constructive criticism, but as I was reading the monolouge i felt like i was doing a chore.  It took away from the meaning behind it.

I can tell whats going on in the monologue, but there's no emotion i'm recieving from it.  it's extremely matter of fact.
Logged

I embrace my desire to feel the rhythm, to feel connected enough to step aside and weep like a widow to feel inspired, to fathom the power,to witness the beauty, to bathe in the fountain, to swing on the spiral of our divinity and still be a human.
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2008, 12:49:18 PM »

Snapdragon, thanks for the compliments and the personal reference in the form of that write-up.

My personal take on the monologue is that it's very much monologue-ish, kind of like those character soliloquy's that Shakespeare is prone to. It strikes me as very stilted in its awareness of the public, slightly humorous, and largely matter-of-fact as I believe Seamus was pointing out.

The entire snippet causes me to feel lighter and disconnected, and I agree, there is very little emotion in the work, at least emotion that triggers a strong response as most tend to accomplish. The writing makes you think significantly more than I believe I or other descriptive and emotionally-based writers are used to.

Bravo regardless.
Logged

Harle
rather fluffy

Aww s'a l'il mousie! ^.^

***
Offline Offline

New Brunswick
Posts: 116


« Reply #13 on: May 09, 2008, 09:07:10 AM »

Snapdragon, I have to firmly suggest you don't listen to the criticism of that piece.

I thought it was simply wonderful! In fact, one of the more enjoyable bits of casual expressive writing I've read in some time. I think it's something better appreciated with an extensive vocabulary, and better read in the mind with a flair of the dramatic in tone. The monologue loses something in writing unless you can verbalize it in your imagination.

To Seamus; if you don't like Shakespeare, you won't like the monologue, or for that matter, most iambic pantameter and the other things he's done. If you don't quite 'get' something it doesn't mean it's 'choppy' or 'bad.' You have to read a monologue with a particular flow. If you don't catch that flow, it can be like trying to decipher a paragraph without punctuation. But a well written piece establishes the flow very early on, and sticks with it.

As for preferring simple words to complex ones, that would certainly take something away from the flowery nature of this kind of expression. I certainly didn't have any trouble with it. As they say, there's a time and a place for everything. And a monologue is the time and place for linguistic artfulness.

And with that, wonderful display, Snapdragon. You have a powerful command of the english language. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Not everyone really 'gets' this sort of thing. =)
« Last Edit: May 09, 2008, 09:13:48 AM by Harle » Logged
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #14 on: May 09, 2008, 10:30:09 AM »

I'd be surprised if anyone really 'got' Shakespeare. Smiley I have more of a tendency to enjoy it, as it's an interesting writing style in its own right, and personal dislike for the dramatic or effluent writing style can sometimes infringe upon that. I quite like Snapdragon's piece, although it's nothing like my style, or style preference. ^_^

I definitely encourage more personal works, as they let us express ourselves as we see fit.

In all honesty, I found Seamus' 'choppy writing' statement somewhat troubling as well, however I'm trying not to specifically disagree with his statement, but rather to say that, in my opinion (and obviously Harle's), it's not so much choppy as it is a different writing style that many are not used to.

No bickering in my creativity thread, dammit! XD

*giggles*
Logged

Seamus
fluffy beast

Navy Fur

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Washington St. USA
Posts: 273


« Reply #15 on: May 09, 2008, 04:45:48 PM »

i sould have been a little more specific in that statement.  I get Shakespeare, I took had to spend 2 years with him as part of my degree Wink  and I really cannot stand his writing style because i feel it's very hot and cold.  It was not a shot at snapdragon, more or less the style itself.

However my opinion still stands on the whole over complication issue.  It couldn't reach me on an emotional level because i felt like i was doing work.  It's simply something to consider if you plan on writing for an extended audience.

Regardless, if i didn't say it before, you obviously put a good deal of work into it.  So for that i'm sure there are those who will enjoy it.
Logged

I embrace my desire to feel the rhythm, to feel connected enough to step aside and weep like a widow to feel inspired, to fathom the power,to witness the beauty, to bathe in the fountain, to swing on the spiral of our divinity and still be a human.
Aaeden
fluffy beast

Ocelot

****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316


WWW
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2008, 10:29:32 AM »

Extended audiences are overrated. Wink It's all about writing what you know and like, but that's just my take on it.

I need to write more, but I never have the time. ><
Logged

Snapdragonfly
new furball?

Unknown

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Alberta
Posts: 36


WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2008, 01:52:34 AM »

 Tongue It's always interesting to see how people react to and interpret one's writing/art etc. My "problem" is that I read too much, and I love to use the vocabulary I've acquired.. When I'm in the writing mood the words just roll out, and although the thesaurus is my friend I wouldn't have used it in a composition like this. (I find Thesauruses are most helpful for essays and stories). Actually I find far too many people don't read enough, the horror of writing a group essay!!! (How! How is it you actually wrote that sentence for a university paper?! Didn't you encounter any english grammer.. ever??) (Oh yes, I'm a bit of a snob(???) when it comes to that at times.. Or maybe having a teacher as a Mom did it...) (Yeah, I'm one of THOSE people that type in full sentences with punctuation on MSN etc..)

Of course I don't find it hard to read my own piece because I wrote it and the flow came from my own head. I do take it as a compliment that you find it similar to shakespeareanesque (grin) writing, likely that sort of prose is was what I was going for. I do have to be in that sort of mood to write like that.. Anyhow, each to their own I suppose. (I was going to link to other writing of mine, but some of it is rather odd (more so for being a blog), so lest I bewilder and alienate you all before you know me I shall hold off! [I'm so melodramatic when tired]

And Thankee Harle and Aaeden, I'm glad you liked it!
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!